Is there really a difference between these often-confused name? The answer is an emphatic yes. National park and forest have very different purposes; together they provide is all with a wide spectrum of uses.

　National Parks emphasize strict preservation of pristine areas. They focus on protecting natural and historic features plus light -on-the land recreation. The ultimate goal is to preserve resources ""unimpaired for future generations. "Park rangers work for the National Park Service under the Department of the interior.

　National Forests ,operating under a "multiple use" concept, are managed to provide services and commodities, including lumber , cattle grazing minerals, and recreation with and without vehicles . National forests are managed by the U.S Forest Service under the Department of Agriculture.

　There are many similarities. For example, both agencies have designated wilderness where they strive for maximum protection of natural landscapes. Both manage fire to promote forest health and reduce risks of wildlife.

　Yet , because they have different purposes, parks and forests may need to have very different rules. For example, national parks usually forbid hunting, while forests usually allow it. Dogs ca be taken on national forests trails, but not on those in parks. National forests may provide trails for mountain bikes and motorcycles; national parks do not.

　Because Sequoia & Kings Canyon National Parks are next to Sequoia, Sierra, and I Inyo National forests, visitors need to pay some attention to where they are. Legal activity in a forest may earn you where you are and which rules apply, or ask park ranger. In this case, these is a lot in a name.

日本語に